Sep
18

Christianity and the DN Platform are Incompatible

Never before in the history of the United States of America has an election represented such contrasting worldviews. The only one that came close was the race of 1860, when the question of slavery was front and center.  Then, Americans elected a Republican, and one who was on the right side of history. I hope that they will do the same in 2012. I say that because of two massively important moral issues that are at the forefront today.

The two moral issues that dominate the national debate today are the definition of marriage and the rights of the unborn. On both of these, the Democratic National Platform has drawn its line in the sand; a line that is utterly at odds with the teachings of the Bible, and therefore, incompatible with true Christianity.

If you browse to democrats.org you can read their explicit positions on both of these issues. On the definition of marriage, the DNC has decided to champion the cause of the gay and lesbian lifestyle, and have come out of the closet in support of so-called gay marriage.  Of course, they are buttressed by the fact that President Obama is the first US President to voice his support of “marital equality”.

The Bible calls homosexuality a sin (Romans 1.26-27) and teaches that marriage is a creation ordinance, and is between a man and a woman (Genesis 2.24). To say as much is not hate, as many on the left love to say. The Bible simply and clearly teaches this, and as a Christian I take my moral cues from the Bible, not the latest cultural fad.

Put frankly, the stand that the DNC and the current President have taken on marriage and sexuality is incompatible with biblical Christianity.

On President Obama’s re-election website, staffers call the Republican Platform intolerant and mean spirited. Why? Because of the Republican’s “anti-choice” stand; i.e., that the Republicans oppose abortion even in the case of rape and incest (ironically, the current Republican presidential candidate is on the record saying that he supports and exception in those cases). Of course, the DNC is not so concerned with abortion in the case of rape and incest – it is a tiny percentage of the abortions that occur in the USA (though I am still very much against abortion in those cases, since the baby has done nothing wrong). The DNC opposes all forms of restriction on “a woman’s reproductive rights.”

That is the immoral irony of the platform. They say they are for all the vulnerable demographics. They champion minority rights and workplace equality, etc. Yet, they are staunch in their belief that the most vulnerable demographic among us has no rights at all, not even the right to life. That trumps their supposed support of every other demographic, doesn’t it? They do not really support minority groups or the “underprivlidged” or the “working class”, or even women. I say that because they advocate killing members of all those demographics (potentially, in the case of the working class) while they are most defenseless – while they are still in the womb.

The Bible teaches that man is made in the image of God (Genesis 1.27). And the Bible forbids murder (Exodus 20.13). There is no compelling moral argument to support the crazy idea that killing a baby while he or she is in the womb is anything less than murder. Therefore, the DNC support of “reproductive rights” is incompatible with biblical Christianity.

I won’t lie. I disagree with the dems on a host of issues, moral and economic. Nevertheless, their stand on these two issues seals the deal for me. I hope American Christians will be Christian enough to stand up in November to vote Obama (and other democrat leaders who support the DN platform) out of office.

 

 

 

Jun
06

Christianity and Humanism

A discussion in comments between Bato, who describes himself as a secular humanist, and me, a Christian. The entirety of the discussion will be in the comments section. Ground rules are mutual respect and some meaningful interaction.

Update: 06/14/2011 It has been a week and Bato has not responded so I am taking it that he changed his mind (he agreed to the debate on a Facebook post, where he was attempting to discredit Christianity). It is really too bad; I was looking forward to showing why secular humanism is one of the most irrational and spiritually bankrupt religions. Not because I like debate – on the contrary; but because our only hope is the grace of God through Jesus Christ.

 

Mar
16

Bell Taken to Task by Bashir

In this interview, Martin Bashir asks a tough question that Rob Bell tries to dodge. Notice what Bell does not answer; he does not show why a person’s response to Christ matters in regards to his eternal destiny. He does not answer because, in his theory, there is no good answer. He does not want to say that a response to Christ does not affect one’s eternal destiny, but that is the inescapable conclusion when one denies the wrath of God.

Honestly (and I don’t mean this as a bash on another pastor), Bell should have thought through his theology better than he has. There are huge holes and he has no idea how to fill them.

Jan
27

Theological Mountain/Exegetical Molehill???

As a pastor, I am concerned with the rising movement of theistic evolution within evangelicalism. Mohler is right, it is proving to be the next big challenge for the church. BioLogos, in particular, is becoming more aggressive and winning more support among professing evangelicals like Joel Hunter, pastor of Northland, a Church Distributed.  Joel Hunter has gone on the record in support of BioLogos and of evolution. In fact, Hunter recently wrote a follow-up after a BioLogos workshop asking, “Why are we afraid of the facts of evolution…?” . Then he made the incredibly audacious claim that “denying the consensus of science on evolution or climate change… does not glorify God “. Really? What if the consensus of science is wrong?  Just because a group agrees about something does not mean that they are correct (i.e., agreement does not equal truth).

Mohler, on the other hand, contends that those who say evolution is compatible with the biblical account always do so to the detriment of what the Bible actually says, writing:

“Most of those who urge a reconciliation of evolution and the Christian faith do so at the most superficial level, without ever acknowledging the near-total transformation of Christian theology that must result if serious minds ask the serious questions and do the serious work of actually thinking seriously.”

The new rise of evolutionists within our evangelical ranks – with their sneering and condescension – is nothing new. It is something old and dangerous with a new veneer. It is liberalism.  BioLogos is the new face of evangelical liberalism (or, at least, part of the new face), and Pastor Joel Hunter is, at the very least, entirely complicit.

Sep
09

An Open Letter to Pastor Terry Jones

Dear Pastor Jones,

I was appalled to read of your plan to burn the Koran on September 11. While I celebrate your freedom as an American to express yourself however you wish (so long as it is civil), I suggest that you are about to do something very un-American. Ours is a land of freedom and tolerance; a nation founded on biblical principles and that sanctions no state religion, but instead offers freedom and refuge to all peace loving people. And while I agree that there should be no mosque built near Ground Zero out of respect for those who died on 9/11, I believe the method of your proposed protest to be entirely irresponsible, coloring Americans as spiteful and intolerant while endangering the brave men and women who continue to fight for the freedom we Americans so cherish.

But on another, far more serious, level I urge you to reconsider. You are not expressing yourself only as an American citizen, but as a Christian Pastor – an Ambassador of Christ. We pastors are called to preach Christ, not intentionally incite animosity and anger with insults. I propose that your plan to publicly burn the Koran has nothing to do with the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. And I hope that you will ask yourself seven questions before proceeding:

  1. As a result of the Koran burning, how many Muslims will hear and believe the truth that God so loved the world that he sent his only Son?
  2. After you publicly desecrate what they consider sacred, will more Muslims or less be inclined to listen to the greatest news in all of life?
  3. How does burning the Koran promote the truth and values that Jesus Christ taught his followers to observe?
  4. How does burning the Koran demonstrate the fruit of the Spirit that Paul taught?
  5. How does burning the Koran relate to the methods and example of the early church as recorded in the Book of Acts (think Mars Hill)?
  6. How does burning the Koran relate to the Great Commission or Jesus’ prophetic charge in Acts 1.8?
  7. Honestly, what biblical text has led you to believe that this is a good thing to do?

My advice to you, Pastor Jones, is simple: stop what you are planning and return to the true, biblical role of a pastor: enjoying, living, promoting and preaching the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ at home and among the nations.

In Christ, and for His Glory Among the Nations,

Mike Johnson