I decided to post brief reviews in this space of each book that I read this year, even if they are 11 years old. In 1997, N. T. Wright wrote, What Saint Paul Really Said, which I finished reading yesterday (and, about which I wrote a 4-page academic review). In the book, Wright basically reconstructs Paul’s background and setting, and then uses that background as a lens through which to read and interpret the Epistles. The outcome is a theological re-write, especially concerning justification and the gospel. The book is interesting, written with a razor-sharp style and compelling to a degree (especially many facets of the socio-historical setting of Paul).
However, Wright’s imbalanced hermeneutic makes many of his conclusions suspect. He puts excessive emphasis on the historical setting; so much so, that at points Paul seems at odds with Paul, especially concerning justification.
So, I cautiously recommend this book to anyone who wants to investigate the claims of the New Perspective on Paul. I say cautiously, because one must weigh carefully Wright’s theological conclusions. Perhaps, a good follow up book is The Future of Justification, by John Piper.











